TL;DR
Get beauty and skincare favorites delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A friend of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle told The Times that the couple dislike being described as “working members of the Royal Family.” The source said they remain members of the family but do not work for the royal institution; the account is attributed to a friend, not a direct statement from either Sussex.
A friend of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle told The Times that the couple dislike being called “working members of the Royal Family,” arguing that the wording confuses their family status with their relationship to the royal institution. The remarks, reported by Marie Claire, are attributed to a friend rather than to Harry or Meghan directly.
The friend described the phrase as “a really lazy phrase” and said, “He hates it, she hates it.” The source argued that Harry and Meghan are not working for the institution, but remain members of the Royal Family and carry out work of their own. The account does not identify the friend by name.
The source also said Meghan runs a business “seven days a week” and that the couple’s days are organized around both family life and work. Those statements provide the friend’s account of their routine; the report does not independently document their work schedules or specify which business activities the source meant.
On the couple’s visit to Nottingham, the friend said the engagement was not conducted in the name of the institution or the Crown. The source described Harry as the King’s son and a Royal Family member, while distinguishing that status from membership in the institution. The report says the couple had recently undertaken the visit, but the supplied material gives no date, detailed itinerary or official description of its arrangements.
How Royal Labels Shape Public Perception
The disagreement is about more than a preferred label. The friend said descriptions such as “working members of the Royal Family” and “former royals” can affect how the couple are perceived and how their activities are discussed. The distinction they draw is between belonging to the royal family and carrying out official work for the institution or Crown.
That distinction matters when readers interpret public appearances. If an event is not undertaken on behalf of the Crown, describing it as an official royal engagement could give a different impression of its purpose and authority. Conversely, calling Harry and Meghan “former royals” may obscure the family connection the source says remains. The report relays the friend’s view; it does not establish a universally accepted terminology or show how audiences respond to each phrase.
For readers following the Sussexes, the account offers a glimpse of how they reportedly want their independent work understood. It does not amount to a new announcement about their role, a change in royal arrangements or a direct statement from the couple.
royal family member business accessories
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Family Membership and Institutional Work
The source material describes Harry and Meghan as no longer senior royals and presents their current work as separate from duties carried out for the royal institution. The friend’s central point is that family membership and institutional employment are not the same thing. The report does not give a detailed account of the couple’s formal status or set out the rules governing royal titles and public engagements.
Marie Claire’s account also places the comments alongside the couple’s Nottingham visit and reports that they had recently moved from California to the United Kingdom and settled their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, into new schools. These details are presented in the original report, but the supplied material does not identify the source for each one or provide dates and independent confirmation. They are background to the coverage, not evidence that the couple have resumed official royal duties.
The quoted friend specifically said the Nottingham visit was not in the name of the institution or the Crown. That is the clearest stated distinction in the account between a public appearance by Harry and an institutional engagement.
““‘Working members of the Royal Family’ is a really lazy phrase. He hates it, she hates it.””
— A friend of Harry and Meghan, speaking to The Times as quoted by Marie Claire
What the Report Does Not Establish
The comments come from an unnamed friend, and the supplied report does not say whether Harry or Meghan approved the remarks or would use the same wording themselves. Their reported dislike of the phrase is therefore an attributed account, not a direct public statement from either of them.
The material also does not specify the publication date, identify the friend, or provide a full account of the Nottingham visit. It does not clarify what activities the couple currently undertake, how they describe their own status, or whether any official royal body has responded to the friend’s comments.
Marie Claire’s report mentions a move to the United Kingdom and new schools for the children, but the supplied text offers no dates or supporting detail for those claims. The available information does not indicate a change in the couple’s formal relationship with the royal institution.
No Formal Change Reported
The account does not announce a forthcoming decision, scheduled engagement or change to Harry and Meghan’s status. The next developments, if any, would need to come from a direct statement by the couple, further reporting that identifies or clarifies the friend’s account, or an official description of a future public appearance.
For now, the reported point is limited: a friend says the Sussexes object to a phrase that, in the source’s view, blurs the line between royal-family membership and work for the institution. Whether the couple will address the wording themselves remains unknown.
Key Questions
What phrase are Harry and Meghan reportedly said to dislike?
A friend told The Times they object to “working members of the Royal Family,” calling it a “really lazy phrase.”
Did Harry or Meghan say this directly?
No direct statement from either of them appears in the supplied report. The comments are attributed to an unnamed friend.
What distinction does the friend make?
The friend says Harry and Meghan remain members of the Royal Family but do not work for the royal institution. The source describes their work as separate from duties carried out on behalf of the Crown.
Was the Nottingham visit an official royal engagement?
The friend said it was not conducted in the name of the institution or the Crown. The supplied material does not include an official account of the visit’s status or arrangements.
Does the report announce a change in the couple’s royal status?
No. It reports a friend’s views on terminology and does not announce a formal change to Harry and Meghan’s status or duties.
Source: rss
Evergreen bestsellers Picks
bestsellers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
